ORION is an infrastructure monitoring and decision-support system for civil protection and crisis management
ORION helps teams quickly assess facility readiness, detect disruptions, and maintain operational awareness of infrastructure in situations where time, reliable data, and sound decision-making matter most.
- fast assessment of facility readiness
- monitoring of disruptions and operating conditions
- local deployment with full data control
ORION supports institutions and teams responsible for infrastructure readiness, continuity of operations, and operational decisions in situations that require rapid understanding of facility status and operating conditions. It can be deployed step by step — starting with a single facility, a single scenario, or a single operational environment — without the need to begin with a large-scale rollout across the entire organisation.
In a crisis, the problem is not simply the lack of a decision. The problem is the lack of reliable data needed to make the right decision on time.
In many organisations responsible for human safety, facility readiness, and infrastructure continuity, the hardest part is not the response itself, but quickly establishing the actual condition of a facility and determining whether it is safe to base an operational decision on it. When information is fragmented, readiness verification takes too long, and conditions inside a facility can change faster than information flows, even a well-prepared team operates under the pressure of uncertainty.
Fragmented information about facility status
Information about facility readiness is often scattered across documents, systems, notes, phone calls, and the knowledge of individual team members. When it is needed most, it is difficult to quickly build a single, reliable picture of the situation.
Manual verification takes too long
Assessing whether a facility can fulfil its operational role or accommodate people often depends on phone calls, field confirmations, and manual collection of data from multiple sources. This slows down response precisely when time matters most.
Facility readiness is not a fixed condition
Even if a facility was previously considered ready, its operating conditions can change. Once the facility is activated or people are accommodated inside, disruptions may occur that affect safety and the ability to continue operations.
A crisis means time pressure and disruption
In a real operational situation, teams cannot always rely on smooth information flow, full internet availability, and comfortable analysis. They need a system that supports situational assessment even when the working environment is disrupted.
For public administration, crisis management centres, and organisations responsible for civil protection, the fast assessment of facility readiness is no longer only a matter of good organisation. It is part of real operational responsibility in the current legal and operational environment.
ORION was designed precisely to shorten the path from fragmented signals to operational decision-making.
ORION turns fragmented information about facility status into an operational picture that is ready to support action
ORION is not just another reporting layer. Its role is to help teams move faster from fragmented data and signals to a structured operational picture that supports readiness assessment, disruption detection, and further team action. As a result, the organisation does not operate in a purely reactive mode. It gains a system that supports faster understanding of infrastructure status, earlier detection of change, and better preparation for operational decisions.
1
From manual verification to rapid readiness assessment
Instead of gathering information from multiple places and confirming facility status in a fragmented way, the team gains a structured picture of the situation faster and can determine the operational status of the facility more efficiently.
2
From fragmented signals to a single operational picture
ORION helps combine infrastructure data, facility profile, and ongoing events into one coherent operational context. As a result, operators and decision-makers do not have to assemble the situation from fragments arriving through multiple channels.
3
From reacting after the fact to earlier disruption detection
The system supports not only the initial assessment, but also the observation of changing operating conditions inside the facility. It helps detect disruptions earlier — before they begin to affect human safety or the operational capability of the infrastructure.
4
From dependence on external services to greater operational control
ORION can be maintained locally, allowing the organisation to retain greater control over data, the working environment, and continuity of operations — including in conditions of disruption and limited connectivity.
5
From a difficult starting point to a controlled entry model
ORION can be introduced step by step: starting with a single facility, a selected scenario, or a pilot deployment. This makes it possible to build operational value without having to launch a large-scale implementation project from the outset.
In practice, this means a shorter path from uncertainty to decision, a better understanding of infrastructure readiness, and a greater ability to operate in an environment where the situation may change dynamically.
This value has been verified in tests and operational exercises that assessed ORION in controlled operating scenarios.
Proven value of ORION in tests and operational exercises
ORION has been validated in tests and exercises that assessed its value not only as a technical system, but as a tool that supports decision-making, monitors facility readiness, and maintains operational awareness of infrastructure in situations that require a rapid response. The results show that ORION can meaningfully shorten the time needed to assess the situation, detect disruptions earlier, and support operations even when the working environment is far from ideal.
Facility readiness assessment
approx. 3–5 minutes
This was the time required to assess facility readiness with ORION, compared with approximately 60 minutes of manual verification.
Disruption detection
approx. 4–90 seconds
This is how quickly ORION identified significant disruptions affecting the facility’s operating conditions.
False alarms
0 in controlled test scenarios
In the completed tests, ORION generated no false alarms in the validated scenarios.
Operation during internet loss
core functionality preserved
ORION maintained core operational functionality even during isolation from the internet.
The results come from tests and exercises conducted in controlled, simulated operational scenarios, including crisis situations, operational disruptions, and limited internet connectivity.
How ORION turns facility data into support for operational decisions
ORION does not operate as a black box or a system based on unclear automation. It combines data about the facility with its profile, requirements, and system logic in order to support operational status assessment, disruption detection, and a better understanding of the situation for operators and decision-makers.
This matters because in environments responsible for human safety and infrastructure continuity, what matters is not only the speed of response, but also the predictability of system logic and the ability to base decisions on reliable foundations.
1
ORION receives data from sensors, meters, devices, and selected source systems
This creates the basis for ongoing assessment of the facility’s condition, its operating environment, and changes that may affect operational readiness.
2
ORION relates the data to the facility profile and facility passport
Raw data alone is not enough. ORION interprets it in the context of the facility’s function, equipment, parameters, and operational requirements, making it possible to understand the meaning of individual signals correctly.
3
ORION determines the facility’s operational status based on data, configuration, and system rules
Operational status and the identification of significant changes do not result from an arbitrary AI opinion. They are based on data, configuration, facility profile, and defined criteria and system rules assigned to a given type of facility and the way it is intended to operate.
4
ORION detects disruptions and supports interpretation of the situation
The system helps identify changes, anomalies, and disruptions that may affect the facility’s operational capability. The analytical layer supports understanding of the situation, but does not replace logic based on data and system criteria.
5
ORION supports the collaboration of operators, decision-makers, and response teams
Insights generated by ORION can support the work of people responsible for situational assessment, operational response, and continuity of operations. This creates a natural bridge between infrastructure monitoring and the collaboration of teams operating in conditions of disruption and time pressure.
ORION supports the decision. It does not replace the human operator or operational procedures.
Thanks to this logic of operation, ORION is more than a tool for collecting signals. It is a system that structures data in the context of the facility and supports the transition from observation to operational decision-making.
This logic is best understood through concrete operational use cases.
How ORION works in real operational scenarios
The scenarios below show how ORION can support civil protection and crisis management tasks in the current legal and operational environment, including responsibilities related to the Civil Protection and Civil Defence Act.
Each scenario is different, but the objective remains the same: to understand the condition of the facility more quickly, detect disruptions earlier, and support operational decisions with a reliable picture of the situation.
1
Rapid assessment of facility readiness before receiving people
When there is a need to establish quickly whether a facility can safely fulfil its role, ORION helps base that assessment on current data, facility profile, and defined readiness criteria. As a result, the organisation reduces manual verification time and gains a structured picture of the situation faster.
Result: faster readiness decision, lower risk of acting on incomplete data, better preparation for receiving or
accommodating people.
2
Monitoring conditions after facility activation and detecting disruptions
Activating a facility does not end the need for monitoring. ORION supports the observation of operating conditions after the facility is put into use and after people are accommodated, helping identify changes earlier that may affect human safety, living conditions, or the ability to continue operations.
Result: earlier detection of deterioration, greater control over operating conditions, faster response to disruptions.
3
Maintaining operational awareness in conditions of disruption or limited connectivity
In a situation involving disruption, partial loss of connectivity, or limited internet access, the team still needs to understand what is happening in the facility and what action is required. ORION supports maintaining a picture of the situation even when the working environment is impaired.
Result: greater operational resilience, better continuity of situational assessment, and support for decisions even in
more difficult operating conditions.
4
Assessing the readiness of critical infrastructure and facilities that require continuity of operations
ORION can also support monitoring the operational readiness of critical infrastructure and facilities for which maintaining operation is essential. It helps teams recognise state changes more quickly, identify disruptions, and support personnel responsible for continuity of operations.
Result: better control over infrastructure requiring high availability, earlier recognition of risks, and a stronger ability
to maintain operational readiness.
ORION can support a range of operational roles — from public administration and crisis management centres to teams responsible for infrastructure continuity.
ORION supports institutions and teams responsible for infrastructure readiness and operational decision- making
ORION was designed for environments in which infrastructure status, response time, and the reliability of data
have a direct impact on human safety, continuity of operations, and the quality of operational decisions.
It is a solution for organisations that are not looking for another reporting layer, but for a system that helps them understand facility status faster, detect disruptions, and act on the basis of a structured picture of the situation.
1
Public administration and local government units
ORION supports organisations responsible for facility preparation, readiness assessment, and the coordination ofactivities related to civil protection and response in situations that require a rapid understanding of infrastructure status.
Result: better preparedness, faster facility assessment, greater situational control, and the ability to start on a small scale.
2
Crisis management centres
For crisis management centres, ORION is a tool for building operational awareness of infrastructure. It helps teams understand facility status faster, detect disruptions, and support decisions in an environment defined by time pressure and incomplete data.
Result: faster situational recognition, a clearer picture of facility readiness, earlier disruption detection, and better support for coordination activities.
3
Command centres and teams responsible for continuity of operations
ORION can also support environments in which maintaining the operational readiness of critical infrastructure and facilities that require continuity of operations is essential. In such organisations, what matters is not only monitoring, but also local control, resilience, and the rapid recognition of status changes.
Result: monitoring of critical infrastructure readiness, faster disruption recognition, support for decisions in environments that require continuity of operations, and local control over the system and data.
4
Technology and integration partners
ORION can be developed and deployed in cooperation with partners responsible for infrastructure, communications, operational environments, and the integration of user systems. Its open architecture makes it easier to build solutions tailored to a specific deployment environment.
Result: greater integration flexibility, the ability to deploy step by step, cooperation with the user’s existing
environment, and a lower risk of technological lock-in.
In environments responsible for safety and continuity of operations, control over data, local deployment, and
technological independence matter just as much as the functionality of the system itself.
The ORION architecture was designed around control, local deployment, and continuity of operations
In environments responsible for human safety, infrastructure readiness, and operational decision-making, system functionality alone is not enough. It is equally important where the system operates, who controls the data, what the dependency on suppliers looks like, and whether the solution remains useful when working conditions are disrupted.
ORION was designed from exactly this perspective: as a system that can support institutional operations without giving up control over data, the working environment, and key architectural layers.
1
ORION can be deployed and maintained locally, in an environment controlled by the user. This strengthens operational control and limits dependence on external services that are not always acceptable in environments responsible for safety and continuity of operations.
2
The institution retains control over its data, working environment, and system layer. This is particularly important wherever infrastructure, facility readiness, and operational activity have a sensitive or critical dimension.
3
ORION can be maintained locally, with full control over data, infrastructure, and the analytical layer, reducing dependence on external platforms, public clouds, and foreign jurisdictions.
This makes it possible to build greater operational and technological independence without introducing
unnecessary architectural or legal risk.
4
ORION was designed so that the user is not dependent on a single supplier of hardware, software, or one closed development path. Its open architecture makes it easier to expand, adapt, and develop the system in line with the needs of the organisation.
The deployment model can also include mechanisms that strengthen continuity and long-term maintainability, such as source code escrow. This further reduces the risk of technological dependency and increases the user’s sense of security.
5
ORION does not require building everything from scratch. It can be integrated with the user’s existing environment, which means the deployment can strengthen already functioning processes and systems rather than replace them.
6
Local deployment and control are not just architectural assumptions. They have direct importance for the ability to operate in conditions of disruption, limited connectivity, complete internet outage, and time pressure.
The same logic of control, local deployment, and openness also applies to ORION’s analytical layer.
An open analytical layer tailored to user requirements
The ORION analytical layer was designed to support interpretation of the situation in a way that aligns with user requirements, institutional security policy, and the nature of the operational environment.
This means that ORION is not locked into a single model, a single supplier, or a single technological configuration. It remains flexible wherever local control, compliance with security requirements, and the ability to adapt the solution to a specific environment matter to the user.
1
The analytical layer can operate locally using Polish and European technology components, which supports data control and operational independence.
This is especially important for institutions that need to limit dependence on external services and retain greater control over their operating environment.
2
ORION’s open architecture allows the model to be selected in line with user requirements, institutional security policy, and organisational preferences. This means the analytical layer can be adapted to the needs of a specific deployment, rather than the other way around.
3
ORION’s analytical layer was tested, among others, using the Bielik AI LLM. However, the system’s open architecture makes it possible to select the model in line with user requirements, security policy, and institutional preferences.
This approach strengthens both the Polish deployment context and the flexibility needed in environments with different national or organisational requirements.
4
The analytical layer supports situational understanding and the work of the user, but it does not replace the logic of statuses based on data, configuration, and system rules. This allows ORION to maintain predictability of operation and consistency with the requirements of operational environments.
5
For the user, this openness means greater freedom in selecting components, better alignment with security policy, and a lower risk of dependence on a single supplier or one technological path.
The same principle of local control and resilience also applies to the operational communication of teams using ORION.
ORION supports team collaboration even when operating conditions are disrupted
In operational environments, the situational picture alone is not enough. It is equally important whether the team can communicate securely, exchange information, and work together even when working conditions are impaired.
ORION supports not only infrastructure monitoring and situational assessment, but also the collaboration of operators, decision-makers, and teams responsible for response and continuity of operations.
1
ORION can support the ongoing exchange of information between people responsible for situational assessment, coordination of activities, and operational response.
2
The team can work not only with messages, but also with documents, materials, and files needed for day-to-day operations and coordination.
3
ORION can also support team collaboration through voice calls and video meetings, making coordination easier when rapid information exchange has operational importance.
4
Team communication can remain under local user control, which strengthens security, predictability, and independence from external services.
5
This is especially important wherever disruption of connectivity or loss of internet access cannot be allowed to mean loss of the team’s ability to coordinate actions and exchange information.
6
ORION uses open and federated communication technologies aligned with the European direction of
building digital sovereignty. This strengthens the system architecture without turning
ORION into a separate communication platform. Communication remains part of the operational environment, not a standalone product.
As a result, ORION can support not only understanding of the situation, but also the practical collaboration of teams operating in environments defined by disruption, time pressure, and limited connectivity.
ORION can be deployed step by step – from a single facility to a broader operational environment
Getting started with ORION does not require an immediate large-scale rollout across the entire organisation. The system can be introduced step by step, beginning with a single facility, a single scenario, or a single operational environment.
This matters because in environments responsible for safety, infrastructure readiness, and continuity of operations, what matters is not only the value of the system itself, but also the way it is introduced: safely, in a controlled manner, and in proportion to the organisation’s actual needs.
1
A conversation about the need and the choice of the first facility or scenario
The first step does not have to be a decision about a large deployment. It begins with a conversation about which facility, scenario, or operational environment should be addressed first. This makes the entry point directly connected to a real user need rather than an abstract technology purchase.
2
An exercise or test in a selected environment
The next step can be an exercise or a test that allows ORION to be verified in a selected operational context. This gives the organisation a chance to assess the system in practice and see its operational value without having to start a full implementation from the outset.
3
A pilot on a single facility and in a single operational environment
ORION can begin operating on a small scale — on a single facility, in one operational centre, or in one selected use case. This model makes it possible to build the first practical and operational value without excessive organisational risk.
4
Extension to additional facilities, roles, and scenarios
Only after the test or pilot stage does the system need to be extended to additional facilities, operational roles, and scenarios. This allows ORION to grow step by step and at a pace aligned with the organisation’s readiness.
The environment launched during the exercise or test phase can remain with the user and become the basis for a pilot or the next stage of deployment. This means the first step does not have to be a one-off experiment — it can
lead to durable operational value.
This entry model lowers the threshold for decision-making and allows the organisation to begin working with ORION in a way that is proportionate to the scale of its needs, the readiness of the team, and the selected operational scenario.
Frequently asked questions about ORION
At the stage of discussing a pilot or a first deployment, the most common questions concern ORION’s role, the way the system works, the degree of control over data, and the possibility of starting on a small scale.
Below are the answers to the questions that most often arise before cooperation begins.
Does ORION replace the human operator in decision-making?
No. ORION supports the decision, but it does not replace the human operator or operational procedures. The system structures data, supports operational status assessment, and helps users understand the situation faster, but responsibility for the decision remains with the user and the organisation.
Can ORION operate without the internet?
ORION was designed to preserve core functionality even in conditions of limited connectivity or loss of internet access. This is consistent both with its local architecture and with the results of tests carried out in controlled disruption scenarios.
Is it necessary to replace the user’s existing systems?
No. ORION can be integrated with the user’s existing environment. In practice, this means the deployment can strengthen systems and processes that are already in place rather than require everything to be built from scratch.
Can ORION be launched for just one facility?
Yes. ORION can be deployed step by step, starting with a single facility, a single scenario, or one operational environment. This is one of the core elements of the entry model and an important way to reduce risk at the beginning of cooperation.
What does the first stage of deployment look like?
In most cases, the first stage includes a conversation about the need, the selection of the first facility or scenario, and then an exercise, test, or pilot in a selected environment. Only afterwards does the system need to be extended to further areas of operation.
Where is the data stored and who controls it?
ORION can be maintained locally, in an environment controlled by the user. This allows the institution to retain control over its data, infrastructure, and key layers of the operational environment.
Is ORION tied to a single AI model?
No. ORION’s open architecture allows the analytical layer to be selected in line with user requirements, institutional security policy, and organisational preferences. Among others, the Bielik AI LLM was used in testing, but the system is not limited to a single model.
Does ORION support team collaboration, or only monitoring?
ORION supports not only infrastructure monitoring and situational assessment, but also team collaboration. It can include text communication, exchange of documents and files, as well as voice calls and video meetings in an environment that remains under local user control.
Does ORION support tasks related to civil protection and continuity of infrastructure operations?
Yes. ORION was designed specifically for environments in which rapid facility readiness assessment, disruption detection, and the maintenance of operational awareness of infrastructure matter for civil protection, crisis management, and continuity of operations.
How do you move from a test to a pilot?
The environment launched during the test or exercise phase can become the basis for a pilot. This means the first step does not end with a demonstration, but can lead to a real, step-by-step deployment and further extension of the system.
If ORION addresses the needs of your organisation, the next step does not have to be a large deployment — a conversation about the first pilot or a selected scenario is enough.
Let’s talk about how to start working with ORION in your environment
ORION can be tested and introduced step by step — starting with a single facility, a single scenario, or a single operational environment. You do not need to begin with a large deployment to see its value in practice.
We will show you how ORION can be verified in a real operational environment without launching a large-scale deployment.
